[Dailydave] 3rd Party Doctrine
dave aitel
dave at immunityinc.com
Thu Jun 9 11:39:16 EDT 2016
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646
Someone needs to write this paper, but for the Intelligence Community law...
This is an extremely long way of saying "What we have now as legal
doctrine doesn't work because the physics has changed underneath us." If
you read this paper after reading a lot of the NATO Tallinn documents
you will find yourself understanding why they have to always state first
the relevance of their old legal frameworks to cyber - simply because
they are wrong and they smell it, even if they can't admit it yet. :)
-dave
It's Too Complicated: The Technological Implications of IP-Based
Communications on Content/Non-Content Distinctions and the Third Party
Doctrine
Steven M. Bellovin
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319266>
Columbia University - Department of Computer Science
Matt Blaze
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319278>
University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering & Applied Science
Susan Landau
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1661299>
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Stephanie K. Pell
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1662380>
West Point--Army Cyber Institute; Stanford University - Stanford Law
School Center for Internet and Society
June 7, 2016
/Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Forthcoming
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646##>/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/attachments/20160609/310eab15/attachment.html>
More information about the Dailydave
mailing list