[Dailydave] Watermarking Intrusions.

[Kevin Noble]

I don't agree, this is more like finding a rifle and knowing it has smart
components and being able to classify the weapon because it has an orange
stripe sprinkled with a software taggant.  It has forensic value, not
masking the threat.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Konrads Smelkovs <konrads.smelkovs at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Was difficult to read your piece, but if I understand the gist, then
> doesn't your proposal suffer from the same problem as toy guns that
> were supposed to have a non-removable one-inch-wide orange stripe
> running down both sides of the barrel and the front end of the barrel?
> if I take my AK-47 and paint it brightly, cops won't shoot.
> --
> Konrads Smelkovs
> Applied IT sorcery.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:10 PM, dave aitel <dave at immunityinc.com> wrote:
> >
> http://cybersecpolitics.blogspot.com/2016/03/a-technical-scheme-for-watermarking.html
> >
> > It'd be great to hear from some non-US people in the industry as to
> > whether they think this sort of thing is doable on their end. Likewise,
> > it's not clear what parts of a technical proposal are most important?
> > Are we most worried about non-state actors pretending to be State
> > actors, or having a high confidence level in our result?
> >
> > In any case, hopefully ya'll enjoyed reading it!
> >
> > -dave
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dailydave mailing list
> > Dailydave at lists.immunityinc.com
> > https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydave at lists.immunityinc.com
> https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
>



-- 
Thanks,

Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/attachments/20160309/6da8681e/attachment.html>