[Dailydave] how i contacted cyber terrorists

[Mh]

1. i know of a case of a very eastern country receiving threats after they broke a billion dollar metamphetamine ring hosted in a country in middle east . their emails had signs , through the sighs ME investigators found the group and sent back the judiciary report to the original country . in many ancient colonies , having a sign or contact produced sort of unity , direction , help , alerts , recruitment and announcements . later in more modern societies that had secret cults , signs were continuing to be elements of existence , secret message broadcast where secret channel is unavailable and alike .  

nowadays , such behavior , to me understanding is just enjoying a bit of "catch me if you can" , although being a dark phsyc op shouldn't be ruled out immediately . in mentioned case , i believe the later is the case .

2. take a look at any crypto book under "Birthday Attack" .

Regards
M


On Friday, July ۱۴, ۱۳۹۱ at ۳:۴۹, DarkPassenger wrote:

> good to know a brother ( if you are a sister , drop me a private line IMMEDIATLY :D ) is already pushed the recently famous c5e2b30053762c2984d26b84748c59fc up for crack at Fri 31st Aug,2012 10:40 pm . as a civilian i assume like me he does not know much about terrorism so he is curious to find a way to contact and setup a meet with some nice talented guys for a drink and Hooka session , but i want to make one educated step before and know a thing or two before that . following are the questions :
>  
> 1. from experienced cyber terrorists out there : do you think md5ing a contact is a good idea ? of course i am not asking anybody lessons on number crunching . Q is aiming at the cyber terror side of the issue . all due respects , is mid5ing your contact is a common cyber Soprano practice ? if yes i would like to see a pastebin of any data related to similar behavior in the past . its for real , not playing Bruno for Hezbollah and Mossad guys so do not disappoint me  
>  
> 2. from crypto guys : are there methods for md5 and sha1 to guarantee that a certain hash will not produced out no matter what input? is having such requirement , a part of definition and certifying a serious hash algo or the question is totally irrelevant?
>  
>  
> "- going out ?
> - we all are . act accordingly"
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydave at lists.immunityinc.com (mailto:Dailydave at lists.immunityinc.com)
> https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/attachments/20121016/5c6547b0/attachment-0001.html>