[Dailydave] The monetization of information insecurity
lcamtuf at coredump.cx
Tue Sep 9 12:00:51 EDT 2014
The prehistory of anti-virus software is probably of note. In essence,
they served as a pretty reasonable solution to a nuisance problem of
slowly-evolving, long-lived viruses piggybacking on top of legitimate
executables carried around on floppy disks. There was no pretense of
providing any security boundaries, and the unique properties of this
distribution channel meant that you could actually offer users fairly
clear benefits when exchanging files with trusted parties.
The progression from that to being a primary defense against security
attacks on the Internet makes essentially no sense. I think it had to
do with the entire generation of tech-savvy users and corporate execs
growing up with this technology and incorrectly assuming that it would
scale up on the Internet, or that AV companies would be uniquely
qualified to tackle the problem.
The more interesting question is why has this myth persisted for so
long. It probably has to do with several things. For one, AV companies
made a lot of money and gained a lot of prominence, so they largely
control the narrative and overcrowd trade shows. There is also a
strong appeal for startups to imitate their methods and embrace the
Another reason may be that many people just hope for a silver bullet.
They don't want security to be hard - and they don't want to admit
that AV software + compliance checklists weren't necessarily the right
call back in the day (so it's the "threat landscape" that's changing,
they say). But there are no simple solutions, and if you're hoping for
some, you're likely to just part with your money and get relatively
little in return. I mean, the valuation of FireEye peaked at $10B not
long ago. Flashy threat intelligence (Crowdstrike, 0-day feeds) is
another popular way to go.
All in all, I don't think we can avoid repeating the same mistakes
over and over again. It's a funny industry because you can't really
measure success by any objective, transparent metric. I'm pretty sure
that the key to survival is to just have a competent and balanced
security team, and one that spends more time writing code than
defining controls for ISO 27001. But that's a tough sell, and given
the short supply of talent - and the difficulty in evaluating their
true skill - it is not a viable option for many small businesses.
So, what can we really give them, instead?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:07 AM, dave aitel <dave at immunityinc.com> wrote:
> So I'm heading to a conference shortly and I was going to promote them in
> this email but they're apparently not a public conference. I'm on a panel
> called "Identification of Emerging and Evolving Threats" with some non-US
> Government people who seem pretty nice.
> Anyways, now that I've guaranteed myself an exciting visit from security
> services, I wanted to point out the one question everyone should be asking
> when they go to any conference and a new technology of any kind is proposed
> as any kind of forward movement for defense. And that is this: "How can we
> avoid making the mistake of Anti-Virus" ever again?
> Because much like the Internet has been hamstrung at birth by the parasitic
> growth of the advertising industry, the information security community has
> been devastated for almost its entire existence by the dominance of
> anti-virus companies and products which demonstrably haven't worked for
> almost their entire reign, and in theory never could have scaled. They are
> broken by design. And because they sucked all the money and research and
> people from the defensive community, no actual defenses were ever created
> for IT that had a hope of working.
> So the only question any team of government executives working on defense
> needs to be thinking about is "How is this different from Anti-Virus in the
> long term? How can we avoid making that mistake ever again?" Because until
> you know how that mistake was made, and can avoid it for the next
> generation, "Emerging and Evolving" threats will always be beyond your power
> to stop.
> Dailydave mailing list
> Dailydave at lists.immunityinc.com
More information about the Dailydave