[Dailydave] 3rd Party Doctrine

[dave aitel]

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646

Someone needs to write this paper, but for the Intelligence Community law...

This is an extremely long way of saying "What we have now as legal
doctrine doesn't work because the physics has changed underneath us." If
you read this paper after reading a lot of the NATO Tallinn documents
you will find yourself understanding why they have to always state first
the relevance of their old legal frameworks to cyber - simply because
they are wrong and they smell it, even if they can't admit it yet. :)

-dave


  It's Too Complicated: The Technological Implications of IP-Based
  Communications on Content/Non-Content Distinctions and the Third Party
  Doctrine


    Steven M. Bellovin 

<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319266>
Columbia University - Department of Computer Science


    Matt Blaze 

<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319278>
University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering & Applied Science


    Susan Landau 

<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1661299>
Worcester Polytechnic Institute


    Stephanie K. Pell 

<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1662380>
West Point--Army Cyber Institute; Stanford University - Stanford Law
School Center for Internet and Society

June 7, 2016

/Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Forthcoming
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646##>/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/attachments/20160609/310eab15/attachment.html>