<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.immunityinc.com/products/innuendo/">http://www.immunityinc.com/products/innuendo/</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/regin-top-tier-espionage-tool-enables-stealthy-surveillance">http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/regin-top-tier-espionage-tool-enables-stealthy-surveillance</a><br>
<br>
"Regin displays a degree of technical competence rarely seen " says
Symantec. Which is ... an unwarranted level or superlative rarely
seen.<br>
<br>
I mean, it's great work, and was clearly very successful but there's
not a ton in Regin that you can't buy over-the-shelf as a
penetration testing tool from us in INNUENDO. In fact, in many ways
INNUENDO has superior C2 and is more advanced. INNUENDO stores
itself and its add-on modules encrypted in the registry, for
example, and is more natively extensible thanks to Python and the
overall design. <br>
<br>
There's some interesting notes in the reports: for example, they
were not able to find the exploits used to install Regin. Also I
like how team Kaspersky found one machine running about 5 APTs. <br>
<br>
But either way: INNUENDO is roughly comparable and is not
expensive. <br>
<br>
-dave<br>
<br>
<span style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119); font-family: helvetica,
arial, clean, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: normal;
line-height: 19.6959991455078px; orphans: auto; text-align: start;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
display: inline !important; float: none; background-color:
rgb(255, 255, 255);"><span class="Apple-converted-space"><br>
<br>
<br>
</span></span>
</body>
</html>