<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kaspersky/">https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/06/22/nsa-gchq-targeted-kaspersky/</a><br>
    <br>
    <h1 class="title" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 38px;
      margin: 0px 0px 8px; font-weight: normal; font-family: latoblack,
      Helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: italic; line-height: 40px;
      text-transform: uppercase; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-variant:
      normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start;
      text-indent: 0px; white-space: normal; widows: 1; word-spacing:
      0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255,
      255, 255);">POPULAR SECURITY SOFTWARE CAME UNDER RELENTLESS NSA
      AND GCHQ ATTACKS</h1>
    <div class="ti-byline" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family:
      lato, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 18px;
      overflow: hidden; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-style: normal;
      font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
      orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px;
      text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 1;
      word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
      background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><cite style="box-sizing:
        border-box; text-transform: uppercase; color: rgb(223, 63, 61);
        font-style: normal; font-size: 13px; font-weight: 700;
        margin-right: 10px;">BY<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span
          style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a
            href="https://firstlook.org/theintercept/staff/andrew-fishman/"
            style="box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit;
            text-decoration: inherit; font-size: inherit; background:
            transparent;">ANDREW FISHMAN</a></span><span
          class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>AND<span
          class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span style="box-sizing:
          border-box;"><a
            href="https://firstlook.org/theintercept/staff/morgan-marquis-boire/"
            style="box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit;
            text-decoration: inherit; font-size: inherit; background:
            transparent;">MORGAN MARQUIS-BOIRE</a></span></cite><span
        class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>
      <div class="ti-social" style="box-sizing: border-box; display:
        inline; font-family: lato, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:
        14px; line-height: 18px; text-transform: none;"><a
          class="twitter" href="https://twitter.com/@AndrewDFish"
          style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);
          font-style: italic; text-decoration: none; margin-right: 5px;
          background: transparent;">@AndrewDFish</a><a class="twitter"
          href="https://twitter.com/@headhntr" style="box-sizing:
          border-box; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-style: italic;
          text-decoration: none; margin-right: 5px; background:
          transparent;">@headhntr</a><br>
        <br>
        <br>
        Look, I just want to point out how terrible the reporting was
        that whole week from The Intercept. I know it's not Glenn
        Greenwald, but they really set a bar here in terms of
        "completely not understanding the issue". There's no "Attacks"
        here. Reverse Engineering isn't an attack. Reverse engineering
        is research. A better headline would be "GCHQ, like many
        thousands of other organizations, reverse engineers software so
        it can get its job done, but it also gets a warrant just in
        case."<br>
        <br>
        Yes, technically it needs a warrant. And also, technically, if a
        cop breaks any traffic laws, they need to put their lights on
        and be going to an emergency. But in reality, cops roll through
        stop signs all the time like everyone else, and sometimes they
        double park to get coffee.<br>
        <br>
        When you do shoddy reporting like this, you can't be taken
        seriously when report on bigger issues.  <br>
        <br>
        And they buried the lede! GCHQ is "looking at Kaspersky AV to
        see if they continue to let virus files through their AV". Did
        The Intercept ask Kaspersky about that practice? Why would
        Kaspersky do that, I wonder? :)<br>
        <br>
        -dave<br>
        <br>
      </div>
    </div>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>